Corentin Denolly vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Denolly vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Corentin Denolly vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Denolly 2 - 1 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Denolly has won 47.29% of points on their second serve, while Michalski has won 50.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Denolly, in recent form, has won 53.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 52.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.51% and 33.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Denolly has saved 54.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 59.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Denolly has won 68% of matches played (W/L 51/ 24), with Michalski winning 54.1% (W/L 33/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Denolly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 256/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 42). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 182/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Denolly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.35% of matches (W/L 43/ 19), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 16/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Denolly winning 2 times and Michalski being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Denolly winning 4 and Michalski winning 3. The last match between Denolly and Michalski was at the M25 Antalya, 08-11-2022, First, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Denolly and Michalski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Denolly winning 1 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Denolly winning 1, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Denolly has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.76 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 256.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Denolly has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Denolly has converted 49.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
10
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
361
Rank
289
High
26
Age
L
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
363
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
63% (371-220)
Career Total W/L
62% (215-132)
69% (24-11)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$45,000
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Corentin Denolly | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
Games Won | 31 | 29 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:55 | 1:41:55 |
1st Serve % | 63% (120/189) | 56% (119/211) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (78/120) | 62% (74/119) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (29/69) | 43% (40/92) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (12/32) | 46% (12/26) |
Return Points W% | 46% (97/211) | 43% (82/189) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-3 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Corentin Denolly
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
6-0 6-3 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Daniel Michalski
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Corentin Denolly | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 69% (24/11) | 50% (15/15) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (50/26) | 50% (34/34) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (373/317) | 49% (317/326) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 69% (24/11) | 60% (12/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.14 |
Aces Total | 76 | 43 |
DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.21 |
DFs Total | 133 | 66 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:21 | 1:54:25 |
Avg Opp Rank | 264.49 | 330.8 |
1st Serve % | 65% (1431/2213) | 61% (1340/2179) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (924/1431) | 63% (842/1340) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (363/782) | 51% (425/839) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (134/278) | 47% (91/194) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (1053/2310) | 41% (856/2087) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 43% (10/13) |
Futures W/L | 73% (16/6) | 71% (5/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (24/34) | 50% (15/30) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (7/7) | 70% (7/10) |
Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (4/8) |
1st set W, W | 100% (21/21) | 88% (17/15) |
1st set W, L | 0% (21/0) | 12% (17/2) |
1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (13/0) |
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Lucas Bouquet
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Duarte Vale
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Patrick Maloney
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Meecah Bigun
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Jaycer Lyeons
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Corentin Denolly
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more